SoCal IP Institute MCLE October 15; 101 Eligible Database Claims; Trademark Consent Agreements.

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 15, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

Data Engine Techs. LLC v. Google LLC (CAFC October 9, 2018 available here). Data Engine Tech asserted 4 patents (5,590,259), (5,784,545), (5,303,146)  and (6,282,551) against Google.  The district court ruled all 4 patents were invalid under 101 as […]

By |October 15th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE October 8; Led Zepplein Copyright Issue; Is Corn Thins a Generic Term?

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 8, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin (9th Cir September 28, 2018 available here). Skidmore sued the members of Led Zeppelin for copyright infringement. A band called Spirit toured with Led Zeppelin in the 70’s and wrote a song called Taurus. Led Zeppelin […]

By |October 6th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE October 4; Andrei Iancu weighs in on 101; Time Barred Claims; Cryptocurrency Trademarks

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 4, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

Hyatt v. PTO (CAFC September 24, 2018 available here). Mr. Hyatt sued the USPTO alleging the government acted unlawfully in denying his petition for rulemaking. The district court dismissed Mr. Hyatt’s claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The […]

By |September 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE September 24; Exceptional Patent Case; Real Party in Interest for an IPR

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, September 24, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

In re Rembrandt Techs (CAFC July 27, 2018 available here). Rembrandt Technologies sued a multitude of defendants over several years. These cases were consolidated and after years of litigation a final judgment was entered against Rembrandt as to all its […]

By |September 20th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE September 17; Intellectual Ventures at it Again ; Improper Evidence at TTAB hearing

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, September 17, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

Intellectual Ventures v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (CAFC September 4, 2018 available here). Intellectual Ventures asserted U.S Patent No. 6,640,248 against T-Mobile. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted summary judgment in favor of T-Mobile. The CAFC held […]

By |September 6th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 27; Improper Design Patents; Self Referencing Database Not Patent Eligible ; USPTO unveils “strategic plan”

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 27, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

In re Maatita (CAFC August 20, 2018 available here) Petitioner applied for a design patent on an athletic shoe bottom but was rejected. The patent office reasoned that because applicant used a single, two dimensional plan-view drawing  to describe […]

By |August 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 20; USPTO Attorney Fees in Litigation; Reverse Passing off of Goods.

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 20, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

NantKwest, Inc. v. Iancu (CAFC July 27, 2018 available here) NantKwest applied for a patent at the USPTO but was rejected for obviousness, the PTAB affirmed the rejection on appeal. NanKwest then appealed the board’s decision in district court, […]

By |August 20th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 13; Meme Trademarks, Standing to Appeal an IPR, Prior Art References

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 13, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

GoPro, Inc. v. Contour IP Holding (CAFC July 27, 2018 available here) GoPro instituted IPR review of 2 patents owned by a patent holding company (8,890,954 and 8,896,694). The PTAB found GoPro failed to demonstrate the alleged claims obvious and unpatentable. The CAFC remanded. […]

By |August 8th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 6; Real Party in Interest for IPR Proceedings

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 6, 2018, we will discuss a recent victory at the CAFC:

Applications In Internet Time v. RPX Corporation (CAFC July 9, 2018 available here) The Federal Circuit decided the scope of what a “real party in interest” is under 35 U.S.C. § 312. The statute mandates the petitioner […]

By |August 2nd, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE July 30; Posting to the FDA website considered prior art ; pharmaceutical patents

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 30, 2018, we will discuss:

Jazz Pharm. v. Amneal Pharm. CAFC Fed Cir 7/13/18) (available here).  The CAFC consolidated six IPR proceedings against patents owned by Jazz pharmaceuticals. At issue was whether information posted to the FDA’s website relating to testing certain drugs was publicly accessible. Jazz […]

By |July 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments