SoCal IP Institute :: Dec. 12, 2016 :: APPLE, INC. v. AMERANTH, INC.,

At our next SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, December 12, 2016, we will discuss the following:
Apple Inc. v. Ameranth. (Fed. Cir. November 29, 2016) (available here). In this appeal, the Court reviewed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions in three Covered Business Method (“CBM”) reviews.  Ameranth argued for a substantial evidence standard of review, […]

By |December 8th, 2016|Claim Construction, Patent, Unenforceability|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: December 10, 2012 :: Administrative Procedures Act and Claim Construction

We will be discussing two Federal Circuit cases during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, December 10, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Pregis v. Kappos, Case No. 2010-1492, -1532 (Fed. Cir. December 6, 2012) (attached).

In 2009, Pregis sued Free-Flow for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of Free-Flow’s Patent Nos. 7,325,377, 7,526,904 and […]

SoCal IP Institute :: November 26, 2012 :: Overcoming Prima Facie Obviousness and Standing

We will be discussing two Federal Circuit cases during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 26, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Drilling USA, Inc., Case No. 2011-1555 (Fed. Cir. November 15, 2012) (attached).

This case involves a patent for offshore drilling technology that allows a single […]

SoCal IP Institute :: November 19, 2012 :: Inventorship and Best Mode

We will be discussing two Federal Circuit cases during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 19, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Hor v. Chu, Case No. 2011-1540 (Fed. Cir. November 14, 2012) (attached).

The defendant, Paul Chu, is a professor at the University of Houston.  He is listed as the sole inventor of […]

By |November 16th, 2012|Invalidity, Patent, Unenforceability, Written Description|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: October 1, 2012 :: Inequitable Conduct and Judgment as a Matter of Law

We will be discussing two Federal Circuit cases during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 1, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Outside the Box Innovations, LLC. v. Travel Caddy, Inc., Case No. 2009-1171 (Fed. Cir. September 21, 2012) (attached).

Travel Caddy brought suit against Outside the Box Innovations claiming infringement of two of […]

SoCal IP Institute :: August 20, 2012 :: Fair Use and Enablement

We will be discussing one Federal Circuit case and one Ninth Circuit case during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 20, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc., Case Nos. 10-56710 and 11-55483 (9th Cir. August 14, 2012) (attached).

Noelia Monge is a pop singer and model in Latin America.  […]

By |August 16th, 2012|Copyright, Invalidity, Noninfringement, Patent, Unenforceability|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: May 14, 2012 :: Public Use or Sale and Recapture Rule

We will be discussing two Federal Circuit cases during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, May 14, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below.

Leader Tech., Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 2011-1366 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2012) (attached).

This patent infringement case relates to software that allows users on a network to communicate and collaborate […]

SoCal IP Institute :: August 29, 2011 :: Evidence of Direct Infringement and Reading Out Claim Limitations

We will be discussing one district court case regarding the sufficiency of evidence of direct patent infringement and one Federal Circuit case involving claim construction in our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 29, 2011.  Brief synopses are presented below.

Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 06:08 CV 88 (E.D. Tex. April […]

SoCal IP Institute :: Monday, September 20, 2010

Please join us for the SoCal IP Institute meeting, Monday, September 20 at Noon. This activity is approved for 1 hour of MCLE credit. If you will be joining us, please RSVP to  Amanda Jones by 9 am Monday.

We will be discussing the following cases:

Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc. v. Preci-Dip Durtal SA, (Fed. Cir. Sept. […]

By |September 20th, 2010|Assignment, Invalidity, Patent, Unenforceability|0 Comments