SoCal IP Institute MCLE September 17; Intellectual Ventures at it Again ; Improper Evidence at TTAB hearing

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, September 17, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

Intellectual Ventures v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (CAFC September 4, 2018 available here). Intellectual Ventures asserted U.S Patent No. 6,640,248 against T-Mobile. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted summary judgment in favor of T-Mobile. The CAFC held […]

By |September 6th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 27; Improper Design Patents; Self Referencing Database Not Patent Eligible ; USPTO unveils “strategic plan”

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 27, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

In re Maatita (CAFC August 20, 2018 available here) Petitioner applied for a design patent on an athletic shoe bottom but was rejected. The patent office reasoned that because applicant used a single, two dimensional plan-view drawing  to describe […]

By |August 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 20; USPTO Attorney Fees in Litigation; Reverse Passing off of Goods.

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 20, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

NantKwest, Inc. v. Iancu (CAFC July 27, 2018 available here) NantKwest applied for a patent at the USPTO but was rejected for obviousness, the PTAB affirmed the rejection on appeal. NanKwest then appealed the board’s decision in district court, […]

By |August 20th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 13; Meme Trademarks, Standing to Appeal an IPR, Prior Art References

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 13, 2018, we will discuss the following cases:

GoPro, Inc. v. Contour IP Holding (CAFC July 27, 2018 available here) GoPro instituted IPR review of 2 patents owned by a patent holding company (8,890,954 and 8,896,694). The PTAB found GoPro failed to demonstrate the alleged claims obvious and unpatentable. The CAFC remanded. […]

By |August 8th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE August 6; Real Party in Interest for IPR Proceedings

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, August 6, 2018, we will discuss a recent victory at the CAFC:

Applications In Internet Time v. RPX Corporation (CAFC July 9, 2018 available here) The Federal Circuit decided the scope of what a “real party in interest” is under 35 U.S.C. § 312. The statute mandates the petitioner […]

By |August 2nd, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE July 30; Posting to the FDA website considered prior art ; pharmaceutical patents

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 30, 2018, we will discuss:

Jazz Pharm. v. Amneal Pharm. CAFC Fed Cir 7/13/18) (available here).  The CAFC consolidated six IPR proceedings against patents owned by Jazz pharmaceuticals. At issue was whether information posted to the FDA’s website relating to testing certain drugs was publicly accessible. Jazz […]

By |July 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE July 23; Petition for Certiorari Rule 19

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 23, 2018, we will discuss the following Petition for Certiorari:

Advanced Video Technologies v. HTC Corporation (available here)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 19 provides that where a necessary party to a lawsuit has not been joined, “the court must order that the person be made a party.” […]

By |July 19th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE July 16; Licensing Content not Considered a Financial Service ; Public Availability Cuts off Trade Secret Damages

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 16, 2018, we will discuss:

Apple and Google v. ContentGuard v. Iancu  (CAFC July 11, 2018) (available here).  Google and Apple tried to invalidate a patent using a procedure for CBM’s (covered business methods). They argued U.S. Patent 7,774,280, a patent for digital rights management, could be classified […]

By |July 11th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute: GDPR and the California Consumer Privacy Act 2018: What You Need to Do Now!

Please join us for our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 9, 2018.

SoCal IP welcomes Adam Grant of Alpert Barr & Grant, a prestigious business boutique in Encino, California. Mr. Grant will lead a presentation on General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in light of the California Consumer Privacy Act 2018.

All are invited to join us on […]

By |July 4th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute MCLE July 2; Removing Copyright Information ; Foreign Patent Royalties

For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, July 2, 2018, we will discuss:

WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. (US June 22, 2018) (available here).  35 U. S. C. §271(f)(2) imposes liability on those who ship components of a patented invention overseas to be assembled there. The specific issue in this case is whether one suing […]

By |June 27th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments