For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, January 25, 2021 we will discuss the following DOJ decision (1/15/21) not to alter existing ASCAP/BMI consent decree structure (Decision here) PROs vs Publishers explained here In the final days of the Trump administration, the Dept. of Justice ended its ASCAP/BMI consent decree review without taking [...]
Standing to appeal an IPR is deprived by an agreement of non-infringement Who is entitled to appeal an IPR decision? That is a recurring question in IPR jurisprudence. This still relatively-new process created by the American Invents Act has been found by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to allow "[a] person who is not [...]
To finish off the year, for our last CLE meeting we will discuss some pop culture related cases: Krisko v. Marvel (S.D.N.Y 2020) (Case Here) A Hungarian artist sued Marvel alleging copyright infringement. Specifically, Krisko alleged that Marvel infringed Krisko’s musical work when Marvel made the X-Men cartoon in the 90s. A motion for summary [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, December 14, 2020 we will discuss the following FTC v. Facebook (D.D.C. 2020) (Complaint here) In the final days of the current administration, the FTC has decided to sue Facebook for among other things anticompetitive business practices. The complaint outlines the recent acquisitions Facebook has made [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 23, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. (NDIL 2020) (Case Here) (Complaint here) The District court in the Northern District of Illinois granted plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order. [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 16, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: In Re Zoom Communications Inc. (FTC 2020) (Case Here) Zoom recently entered into a settlement agreement with the FTC. The FTC alleged that Zoom advertised certain security measures and features that were not actually in the product [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 9, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: Valeant Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals (Fed. Cir. 2020)(Case Here) This case further defines the scope of proper venue regarding patent cases. Said the court "TC Heartland raised more questions than it answered; we and district courts around [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 2, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: In Re Nitro Fluids LLC (CAFC 2020) (Case Here) Nitro Fluids petitioned for mandamus review, the Federal Circuit granted in part and denied in part the decision. Interestingly, the Federal Circuit did not order transfer as the [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 19, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: Doc Antle v.Carole Baskin (WIPO 2014) (Case Here) Defendant obtained a domain name allegedly owned by one of the "Tiger King's" Businesses. Tiger King sued and tried to get the domain name using trademark law. WIPO sided [...]
For our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 19, 2020 we will discuss the following cases: St. Jude Medical, LLC v. Snyders Heart Valve LLC (CAFC 2020) (Case Here) Snyders obtained a patent on a heart valve technology and sued St. Jude for patent infringement. St Jude then filed an IPR proceeding at [...]