Two Recent Cases

Two Recent Cases Please join us Monday, June 22, 2026 at noon online or in Westlake Village when we will discuss two recent cases. In a patent case at the Federal Circuit, GoTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2024-1669 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2026)(Opinion by Judge Tarantino reversing Judge Klausner of the Central Dist [...]

Patent Anticipation – 35 U.S.C. § 102; Novelty – 35 U.S.C. § 103; and Patent-eligible subject matter – 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Patent Anticipation - 35 U.S.C. § 102; Novelty - 35 U.S.C. § 103; and Patent-eligible subject matter - 35 U.S.C. § 101. Please join us on Monday, September 29, 2025, at noon, where we will discuss a recent decisions made by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding patent anticipation – section 102, [...]

SoCal IP Law Institute MCLE meeting of August 5, 2024 – Some recent CAFC Section 101 decisions of Patent Eligible Subject Subject Matter

Review of three CAFC cases finding Patent Eligible Subject Subject Matter under 35 USC Section 101. The cases are: Cooperative v. Kollective: Cooperative 21-2167.OPINION.9-28-2022_2010108 ADASA v. Avery: ADASA 22-1092.OPINION.12-16-2022_2049020 Sholem v. Shmuel; 10/13/2022: Sholem 21-2228.OPINION.10-13-2022_2017814 Angelo Gaz, of Counsel for SoCalIP, will lead the discussion.  

Abstract Ideas Invalidate Patents and Pleading TM Infringement for Keyword Ad Use

Please join us on Monday, August 23 at 1:00 pm, when Mark Goldstein will lead a discussion of two recent cases, one addressing whether patents are invalid for claiming abstract ideas and the other about asserting trademark infringement resulting from the use of internet keywords that are the trademarks of another. (Access the cases by [...]

Go to Top