Venue

Home/Patent/Venue

SoCal IP Institute :: April 7, 2014 :: Arbitration clauses in licensing agreements and Nonobviousness standards in design patents

Our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, April 7, 2014 will be a discussion of arbitration clauses in licensing agreements and nonobviousness standards in design patents. Brief synopses appear below. Radware, Ltd. and Radware, Inc. v. F5 Networks, Case No. C-13-02024 (N. Dist. of Cal. 12/23/2013) (available here).  Radware sued F5 for patent infringement in the [...]

By |2014-04-03T23:17:37-07:00April 3rd, 2014|Patent, Venue, Invalidity, Obviousness|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: March 3, 2014 :: Patent Infringement and Venue Cases

Our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, March 3, 2014 will be a discussion of patent infringement and venue. Brief synopses appear below. Realtime Data v. Morgan Stanley, Case No. 2013-1092 (Fed. Cir. 1/27/2014) (available here). Realtime owns patents relating to compressing data for transmission. The defendants use a standard called FAST which is used [...]

By |2014-03-01T00:30:59-07:00March 1st, 2014|Patent, Venue, Invalidity, Noninfringement|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: October 15, 2012 :: Geographically Misdescriptive Trademarks and International Comity

We will be discussing one Federal Circuit case and one 9th Circuit case during our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 15, 2012. Brief synopses are presented below. In re Miracle Tuesday, LLC., Case No. 2011-1373 (Fed. Cir. October 4, 2012) (attached). Miracle Tuesday filed an intent-to-use trademark application for the word mark [...]

By |2012-10-12T20:23:43-07:00October 12th, 2012|Trademark, TTAB, Venue, Damages, Descriptiveness, injunction, Intent to Use|0 Comments

SoCal IP Institute :: April 4, 2011 :: Prima Facie Rejection of Patent Claims, Internet Keywords and Another Texas Transfer Mandamus

We will be discussing three recent, relevant opinions in our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, April 4, 2011. The first case is a decision confirming that neither an examiner nor the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences is required to perform claim construction in rejecting patent applications in view of prior art. The [...]

SoCal IP Institute :: January 10, 2011

Please join us for the SoCal IP Institute meeting, Monday, January 10 at Noon. This activity is approved for 1 hour of MCLE credit. If you will be joining us, please RSVP to  Amanda Jones by 9 am Monday. We will be discussing the following: Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 10-1035, 1055  (Fed. [...]

By |2011-01-07T02:06:46-07:00January 7th, 2011|Patent, Venue, Damages|0 Comments